<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mostly Muppet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mostlymuppet.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mostlymuppet.com</link>
	<description>Part Mop.  Part Puppet.  All Crazy.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on I Can Has Integrity? by Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.mostlymuppet.com/2008/09/04/i-can-has-integrity/#comment-557600</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mostlymuppet.com/?p=2132#comment-557600</guid>
		<description>It's OK. You're comment was adjacent to being completely right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s OK. You&#8217;re comment was adjacent to being completely right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I Can Has Integrity? by Will Hindmarch</title>
		<link>http://www.mostlymuppet.com/2008/09/04/i-can-has-integrity/#comment-557599</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Hindmarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mostlymuppet.com/?p=2132#comment-557599</guid>
		<description>Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I Can Has Integrity? by Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.mostlymuppet.com/2008/09/04/i-can-has-integrity/#comment-557586</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mostlymuppet.com/?p=2132#comment-557586</guid>
		<description>Buzzkill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buzzkill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I Can Has Integrity? by Will Hindmarch</title>
		<link>http://www.mostlymuppet.com/2008/09/04/i-can-has-integrity/#comment-557483</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Hindmarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mostlymuppet.com/?p=2132#comment-557483</guid>
		<description>It's not an oversight in the language, it's a statement on the nature of integrity. Your "integrous" implies something with a likening to integrity, a semblance of it — as the definition for generous involves "showing a readiness to give more of something" but does not necessarily involve the actual giving. That is, an adjective likens, but a noun IS. 

Something that is like integrity is not integrity; that's part of the unique nature of integrity, isn't it? It is complete and solid. It is, according to the OAD, "whole and undivided." A semblance of, a likening to wholeness, doesn't count toward integrity. If a thing isn't complete, then it is incomplete — all qualities shy of completeness are incomplete. Being "almost complete" doesn't get to share the word for completeness. Being complete isn't an adjectival idea, it's a definition of a thing's state.

In English, the notion of something being adjacent to integrity, almost but not complete, is wobbly by design. It's a precarious and unfinished state, meant to seem peculiar in speech. In part, I think this is to protect the quality of integrity as an idea.

"Integrous" is, therefore, absurd. Which is not to say it's necessarily invalid — I think absurdity is sort of what you're after in your usage — but just having it in play runs the risk of it becoming parlance (see "Internets") and losing its impact. When the idea of something-near-to-but-less-than-integrity becomes a state so easily regarded and described that it is "close enough," we're in trouble.

(Too much?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not an oversight in the language, it&#8217;s a statement on the nature of integrity. Your &#8220;integrous&#8221; implies something with a likening to integrity, a semblance of it — as the definition for generous involves &#8220;showing a readiness to give more of something&#8221; but does not necessarily involve the actual giving. That is, an adjective likens, but a noun IS. </p>
<p>Something that is like integrity is not integrity; that&#8217;s part of the unique nature of integrity, isn&#8217;t it? It is complete and solid. It is, according to the OAD, &#8220;whole and undivided.&#8221; A semblance of, a likening to wholeness, doesn&#8217;t count toward integrity. If a thing isn&#8217;t complete, then it is incomplete — all qualities shy of completeness are incomplete. Being &#8220;almost complete&#8221; doesn&#8217;t get to share the word for completeness. Being complete isn&#8217;t an adjectival idea, it&#8217;s a definition of a thing&#8217;s state.</p>
<p>In English, the notion of something being adjacent to integrity, almost but not complete, is wobbly by design. It&#8217;s a precarious and unfinished state, meant to seem peculiar in speech. In part, I think this is to protect the quality of integrity as an idea.</p>
<p>&#8220;Integrous&#8221; is, therefore, absurd. Which is not to say it&#8217;s necessarily invalid — I think absurdity is sort of what you&#8217;re after in your usage — but just having it in play runs the risk of it becoming parlance (see &#8220;Internets&#8221;) and losing its impact. When the idea of something-near-to-but-less-than-integrity becomes a state so easily regarded and described that it is &#8220;close enough,&#8221; we&#8217;re in trouble.</p>
<p>(Too much?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Whelmed by Mostly Muppet</title>
		<link>http://www.mostlymuppet.com/2006/06/01/whelmed/#comment-557266</link>
		<dc:creator>Mostly Muppet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mostlymuppet.com/archives/2006/06/01/whelmed/#comment-557266</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I Can Has Integrity?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Blogging today comes at the suggestion/intervention of a co-worker.  Happy to oblige the readership.
Her quandary: Is there another form of &#8220;has integrity&#8221;, one that denotes ownership with a verb of being as opposed to has/have? So an adjec...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I Can Has Integrity?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Blogging today comes at the suggestion/intervention of a co-worker.  Happy to oblige the readership.<br />
Her quandary: Is there another form of &#8220;has integrity&#8221;, one that denotes ownership with a verb of being as opposed to has/have? So an adjec&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lost: The Beginning Of The End by Mostly Muppet</title>
		<link>http://www.mostlymuppet.com/2008/01/31/lost-the-beginning-of-the-end/#comment-557228</link>
		<dc:creator>Mostly Muppet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mostlymuppet.com/archives/2008/01/31/lost-the-beginning-of-the-end/#comment-557228</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Link Post About Lost...&lt;/strong&gt;

So what if the Summer is over and you&#8217;ll never catch up on your Lost reading group [Via TV Squad] in time for the season 5/series return in February 2009?
So what if you&#8217;ve got multiple opportunities to catch up if you&#8217;re behind (on b...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Link Post About Lost&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>So what if the Summer is over and you&#8217;ll never catch up on your Lost reading group [Via TV Squad] in time for the season 5/series return in February 2009?<br />
So what if you&#8217;ve got multiple opportunities to catch up if you&#8217;re behind (on b&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Mad&#8217; about Twitter by Mostly Muppet</title>
		<link>http://www.mostlymuppet.com/2008/08/26/mad-about-twitter/#comment-556904</link>
		<dc:creator>Mostly Muppet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mostlymuppet.com/?p=2097#comment-556904</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hodgman, Twitter and signed copies...&lt;/strong&gt;

Way back in the beginning of June, John Hodgman (&#8221;PC&#8221; in those Mac &#38; PC ads that Apple does) &#8220;tweeted&#8221; an interesting offer:
re: a TAXONOMY OF COMPLETE WORLD KNOWLEDGE. I will sign and send one to you and the next four who ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hodgman, Twitter and signed copies&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Way back in the beginning of June, John Hodgman (&#8221;PC&#8221; in those Mac &#38; PC ads that Apple does) &#8220;tweeted&#8221; an interesting offer:<br />
re: a TAXONOMY OF COMPLETE WORLD KNOWLEDGE. I will sign and send one to you and the next four who &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Book Review: The Areas Of My Expertise by Mostly Muppet</title>
		<link>http://www.mostlymuppet.com/2007/03/20/book-review-the-areas-of-my-expertise/#comment-556903</link>
		<dc:creator>Mostly Muppet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mostlymuppet.com/archives/2007/03/20/book-review-the-areas-of-my-expertise/#comment-556903</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hodgman, Twitter and signed copies...&lt;/strong&gt;

Way back in the beginning of June, John Hodgman (&#8221;PC&#8221; in those Mac &#38; PC ads that Apple does) &#8220;tweeted&#8221; an interesting offer:
re: a TAXONOMY OF COMPLETE WORLD KNOWLEDGE. I will sign and send one to you and the next four who ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hodgman, Twitter and signed copies&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Way back in the beginning of June, John Hodgman (&#8221;PC&#8221; in those Mac &#38; PC ads that Apple does) &#8220;tweeted&#8221; an interesting offer:<br />
re: a TAXONOMY OF COMPLETE WORLD KNOWLEDGE. I will sign and send one to you and the next four who &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Matthew Sweet Album, Sunshine Lies, out August 26! by Mostly Muppet</title>
		<link>http://www.mostlymuppet.com/2008/08/15/new-matthew-sweet-album-sunshine-lies-out-august-26/#comment-556902</link>
		<dc:creator>Mostly Muppet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mostlymuppet.com/?p=2070#comment-556902</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hodgman, Twitter and signed copies...&lt;/strong&gt;

Way back in the beginning of June, John Hodgman (&#8221;PC&#8221; in those Mac &#38; PC ads that Apple does) &#8220;tweeted&#8221; an interesting offer:
re: a TAXONOMY OF COMPLETE WORLD KNOWLEDGE. I will sign and send one to you and the next four who ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hodgman, Twitter and signed copies&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Way back in the beginning of June, John Hodgman (&#8221;PC&#8221; in those Mac &#38; PC ads that Apple does) &#8220;tweeted&#8221; an interesting offer:<br />
re: a TAXONOMY OF COMPLETE WORLD KNOWLEDGE. I will sign and send one to you and the next four who &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seperated at birth: Maria Bello and Mary McCormack by JP</title>
		<link>http://www.mostlymuppet.com/2008/07/08/seperated-at-birth-maria-bello-and-mary-mccormack/#comment-556678</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mostlymuppet.com/?p=2052#comment-556678</guid>
		<description>Could these two be sisters in some way? :)

Anyone says they are NOT alike is not sane..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could these two be sisters in some way? :)</p>
<p>Anyone says they are NOT alike is not sane..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
